What the CFTC did
The contracts are perpetual futures on individual equity securities. They have no expiry date and track the underlying stock's price. The statement makes four points:
- Approved by lapse, not by order. The contracts were "deemed approved" under CFTC Regulation 40.3. That means the review period ran out without objection, so there is no detailed approval order to read.
- Security futures, not commodity futures. They fall under the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA), which created security futures. The CFMA brings in the federal securities laws and the SEC alongside the CFTC.
- Dual-registered venues only. They may only trade on CFTC-registered exchanges that are also notice-registered with the SEC as securities exchanges.
- Built on the bitcoin perp. The statement presents equity perps as the next step after the CFTC approved Kalshi's bitcoin perpetual on May 29, 2026. It also cites the agencies' March 2026 memorandum of understanding.
The stated goal is to keep US traders on regulated venues rather than "offshore, and often unregulated, venues." The statement names no exchange or stocks, sets no launch date beyond today, and does not mention an SEC order.
Implications for fintechs
The main effect is a legal US route for single-stock perps, a product that, for US users, has thus far been primarily offered offshore or not at all. The implications vary by type of business:
Open questions
The statement is short, leaving open several questions consequential for fintechs:
- Which exchange, and which stocks. Neither is named. Kalshi, Coinbase Derivatives and Bitnomial have each filed for equity perps, but the statement does not say whose contracts were deemed approved.
- Leverage, margin and funding. The statement says nothing about margin levels, how funding payments work, or how they fit the existing security-futures margin rules.
- Who can trade them. The statement does not address retail eligibility or suitability.
- The SEC's view. The statement mentions the SEC only through Chairman Atkins’s “no man’s land” remark. No SEC order or rule filing is cited.
- Legal durability. CME's lawsuit challenging the CFTC's treatment of bitcoin perps as futures (CME v. Selig, D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-02157) is pending. The statement is the chairman's alone, from a Commission that currently has only one member.
What to do now
- Map your stock-linked products. List every perp, swap, CFD-style or tokenized product referencing a single stock, and note whether US users can reach it.
- Re-test your US-access controls. With a regulated alternative now permitted, regulators will ask why US users reached an offshore version. Your geofencing, terms and marketing should all say the same thing.
- Analyze both regimes. For anything touching a stock perp, check SEC broker and exchange questions as well as CFTC registration.
- If you want to offer stock perps, pick a route. Either partner with a dual-registered firm or plan your own registration. Budget time, because both regulators are involved.
- Watch for follow-up developments. These include the listed contract terms, any SEC statement, and the CME v. Selig ruling.
Sources
- CFTC, Chairman Michael S. Selig, Statement on Equity Perpetual Futures (Nov. 3, 2026)
- CFTC, Order Approving KalshiEX LLC BTCPERP Futures Contract (May 29, 2026)
- CFTC and SEC, Memorandum of Understanding Between Agencies, Release No. 9192-26 (Mar. 11, 2026)
- SEC Division of Trading and Markets, Staff Statement Regarding Broker-Dealer Registration of Certain User Interfaces Utilized to Prepare Transactions in Crypto Asset Securities (Apr. 13, 2026)
- SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins, Prepared Remarks Before SEC Speaks (Mar. 19, 2026)
- Complaint, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. v. Selig, No. 1:26-cv-02157 (D.D.C. filed June 18, 2026)
- CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig, The Next Phase of Project Crypto (Jan. 29, 2026)
This post is general information, not legal advice.
- US-regulated exchanges can now list perpetual futures on individual stocks starting November 3, 2026, following CFTC Chairman Selig's announcement that they were deemed approved as security futures.
- These equity perpetuals were approved by lapse under CFTC Regulation 40.3, meaning the review period expired without objection rather than through a formal approval order.
- The contracts fall under dual regulation by both the CFTC and SEC, and may only trade on CFTC-registered exchanges that are also notice-registered with the SEC as securities exchanges.
- The approval creates a legal US path for single-stock perpetual futures, a product previously offered mainly offshore to US users.
- The stated regulatory goal is to keep US traders on domestic regulated venues rather than offshore or unregulated platforms.
- The announcement builds on the CFTC's May 2026 approval of Kalshi's bitcoin perpetual and the agencies' March 2026 memorandum of understanding.
| Approval mechanism | Equity perpetuals were deemed approved by lapse under CFTC Regulation 40.3, not by explicit order. |
|---|---|
| Regulatory classification | The contracts are security futures under the 2000 CFMA, bringing both CFTC and SEC jurisdiction. |
| Trading venue requirements | Only CFTC-registered exchanges that are also SEC notice-registered may list these products. |
| Regulatory precedent | The approval follows the May 2026 bitcoin perpetual approval and March 2026 agency MOU. |
| Policy objective | The goal is to bring US traders from offshore, unregulated venues onto domestic regulated platforms. |
| Implementation timeline | Trading may begin immediately as of November 3, 2026, though no specific exchanges or stocks were named. |
What are equity perpetuals and how do they work?
Equity perpetuals are perpetual futures contracts on individual equity securities that have no expiry date and track the underlying stock's price. Unlike traditional futures, they do not expire or require rolling into new contracts.
Why do equity perpetuals require both CFTC and SEC regulation?
Under the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, these products are classified as security futures. This classification brings in federal securities laws and SEC oversight alongside the CFTC's commodity futures jurisdiction.
Can any exchange list equity perpetuals immediately?
No. Only exchanges that are both CFTC-registered and notice-registered with the SEC as securities exchanges may list these products. Dual registration is a prerequisite.
What was the approval process for equity perpetuals?
They were deemed approved under CFTC Regulation 40.3, meaning the regulatory review period expired without objection. There is no detailed approval order documenting the decision.
How does this affect US users currently trading stock perpetuals offshore?
It creates a legal US alternative to offshore platforms. The regulatory goal is to bring US traders onto domestic regulated venues rather than offshore or unregulated platforms where these products previously traded.
- AI in Corporate Law in 2026: Use Cases & Key BenefitsExplore how AI in corporate law helps you streamline contracts, manage legal risks, improve compliance, and make better business decisions.
- America.gov Integration: Legal Obligations for ContractorsAmerica.gov, the AI chatbot the White House launched on September 29, 2026, is the visible layer of an executive order requiring agencies to integrate their “covered services” with the platform. A covered service is a public-facing federal service that serves more than 100,000 users in a 12-month period and can be accessed or applied for online. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) must issue implementing guidance by about December 28, 2026, and Phase 2, which adds applying for, enrolling in and tracking benefits, is planned for early 2027. This post, the second of three, covers the legal obligations that integration work will bring to contractors.
- Gemini and Grok Power America.gov: Model Choice Impact on AI VendorsAmerica.gov, the free AI chatbot the White House launched on September 29, 2026, is powered by Google’s Gemini and xAI’s Grok. The General Services Administration (GSA) and the White House’s National Design Studio built it as the public’s single starting point for federal services. This post, the last in a three-part series, looks at the models chosen and its implications for other AI vendors.
